It has become better and now we understand that the speed of report generation can affect decision-making.
But what is the value that an accountant began to generate a report faster? Is it true that this affects the acceleration of the decision-making process?
Please note that such questions arise because of the doubts we have written in Impact.
We have many options for what you can write after "that to...". We must remember that User Story should pursue our global goal of product improvements.
We don't need to write what we don't believe in ourselves. In other words, do not write an Impact that does not exist and cannot exist.
Therefore, for a correct User Story, we need to check ourselves: - Making an Impact Map is what contains the goal, who and how will achieve it, what will need to be done.
- We have a global goal (to increase the speed of decision-making for the agreement of contracts)
- We have identified an Actor (Chief Accountant)
- We have formulated an assumption (if the accountant receives a report on all contracts faster, this will lead to the achievement of our global goal)
- As a result, if we understand that our assumption can help achieve a global goal, then we can leave the Impact formulation and test the story
But in the end, we finalized the story so that it would look like this: